http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/pubs/jrnl/2006-TelInf-CopingWithTivo/html/CS06b.htm This is an HTML rendering of a working paper draft that led to a publication. The publication should always be cited in preference to this draft using the following reference:
|
Coping with
TiVo: Opportunities of the Networked Digital Video Recorder
Konstantinos Chorianopoulos*, Diomidis
Spinellis
Athens University of Economics and Business,
Department of Management Science and Technology, Patision 76, GR-104 34 Athens,
Greece
Fax: +30 210 820 3664
Tel: +30 210 820 3663
Abstract
Despite the
progressive switch to digital TV, there has not been any significant change to
the value chain of the TV industry. At the same time, the introduction of novel
information and communication technologies, such as the digital video recorder
(DVR) and efficient Peer-to-Peer (P2P) content distribution, have been regarded
as a threat to the established broadcast business players. Previous research
has described these threats and has suggested competitive strategies, but it
has not investigated the opportunities. Thus, the aim of
tThis work is aims to
identify a framework of new business models that take advantage of the
networked DVR. For this purpose, we examined the TV literature from diverse
academic disciplines, such as mass communication, computer engineering and
advertising research. We have also collaborated with network and multimedia
engineers, with broadcasters, and we examined novel interactive television
(ITV) prototypes. The results
findings suggest that the networked DVR could
be exploited to provide personalized channels and that the dynamic advertising
insertion could be introduced as an effective advertising format. In the light
of these findings, the TV industry should consider the pro-active adoption and
facilitation of the networked DVR infrastructure.
Keywords:
Business Model, TiVo, Digital Interactive TV, Content Management
During the last
two decades, there have been many research projects, market trials
and commercial products that have developed digital TV (DTV)
and that have given the promised of
the interactive TV (ITV). Nevertheless, the majority of the TV
audience is still not receiving the benefits of easy access to diverse and
personalized TV content (Atkin 2003; Carey 1997; Hart
2004 Gerbarg;
Theodoropoulou 2002). In particular, the broadcast mentality has implicitly
imposed an artificial association between content distribution and content
packaging. , which means
that As a result, currently content has to be
distributed and consumed through unidirectional and inflexible TV channels. However, Tthe his
traditional TV value chain has been is being disrupted
by novel information and communication technologies, —which
a
change that could be beneficial for consumerviewers
and as well
as the commercial TV stakeholders, as well.
The most important technological changes regard are in the areas
of content distribution, packaging and advertising. In the past, TV
viewers had become accustomed to the inflexibility of the broadcast schedule
and to the burden of irrelevant advertising (Dawson 1996). , but lLately however,
technological innovation —with in the form of digital video recorder
(DVR)[1]
devices, such as TiVo (http://www.tivo.com),—
has allowed unsophisticated
them to viewers to time-shift
TV programs and to fast-forward through the advertising break with a minimal
effort. The widespread use of the DVR might mean the end of the
traditional advertising break (Rose 2003). In addition, despite the increased production of
audiovisual material, the pipes that feed content to TV viewers have been
governed by the economics of broadcast (e.g. in the form of terrestrial
TV), or inflexible channel bouquets (e.g. in the form of multichannel
cable and satellite), which . Both put the highest priority to the
content with the widest spatiotemporal appeal, as
demonstrated by (e.g. geographic region licensing and
prime time airing). NowadaysIn parallel,
novel Internetinternet peer-to-peer (P2P) content
distribution technologies (e.g. , such as BitTorrent), have
allowed consumerviewers to
efficiently share TV content that has
not yet been aired in a geographic area efficiently, and, more often than not, illegally.,
which This
reality poses a new threat to traditional broadcast
distribution.
Some of the
above threats have been addressed by previous research, which has also proposed
feasible paths of action. The majority of the consumer behavior research
in ITV has investigated adoption of new TV technology (Choi et al. 2003). The
business model implications of the DVR have been treated at the strategic and
industry structure levels (Wirtz and Schwarz 2001), in which they identified
the threat of the DVR for the traditional business model. Additional business
model research has treated investigated digital
TV advertising (Pramataris et
al. 2001) and digital pay TV (Kaitatzi-Whitlock 1999), but it
has neglected to regard examine the
networked DVR as a node in the content delivery chain and as a personalized TV
channel provider.
The motivation for this research stems from the
approach of Our work complements previous research ,
which has not yet regarded the by looking at
the new TV information and communication technologies
as opportunities for new business models. In this paper,
we are We therefore exploring explore the
business model opportunities --for existing
players and new market entrants-- offered by the networked DVR,
which we regard as a node in a converged (Internetinternet
and broadcast) TV value chain. In particular, we suggest that the networked DVR
can plays
two roles, which that have been traditionally assumed by
the TV channel operator: 1) Sthe yndicates
syndication
of content from hybrid networks, such as (broadcast channels and
the , Internetinternet); and 2) the packages
the ing of content together with Aadvertisements (ads) ds
to match the a particular household’s
preferences. Overall, we suggest that the exploitation of efficient Internetinternet
video distribution and the local storage of content for personalizing TV
channels and advertisements ads (Ads)
is a major opportunity for the TV industry.
In
Section 2, we provide a review of the threats of the DVR and Internet
to the current business model by examining previous research about TV
consumption, advertising and distribution. In the third section, we leverage
the analysis of a few experimental applications of the networked DVR into a
framework that augments the TV experience and depicts the new business model
opportunities. In Section 4, we discuss the benefits of the proposed framework
for established and new players in the TV industry. Finally, we discuss the
ethical implications of the adoption of the DVR and give suggestions for
further research.
I have never seen a bad television program, because
I refuse to. God gave me a mind, and a wrist that turns things off.
Jack Paar
In
this section, we Let us briefly highlight research findings
that are relevant to the traditional TV distribution, packaging and
advertising. The objective of Through this
literature review is to we can re-assess
the significance of the threats to the established business model and to
set the background for identifying the opportunities of the
networked DVR for new business models.
TV content
distribution has been performed mainly in real-time over broadcast
communication channels (cable, terrestrial, and satellite), which, from a
technical viewpoint, have some particular advantages and disadvantages. The
major advantage of broadcast delivery is the achievement of a wide population
reach with a zero marginal cost for each additional viewer. On the other hand,
the investment for infrastructure, the scarcity of the available spectrum, and
the cost of air-timeairtime
during prime-timeprime
time makes the distribution of content unprofitable, unless there is a
critical mass of viewers for that content. TV practitioners are referring to
this phenomenon as the economics of broadcast.
The economics of
broadcast affect firstly the free-to-air terrestrial TV, which is supported by
advertising. Multichannel pay-TV broadcasters
operators broadcast content over cable, or
satellite links. They are not so much depended on advertising revenues, because
they receive a monthly subscription fee for each set-top box (STB)
installation. Still, content distribution through multtlichannel TV offers an inflexible
bouquet of channels and content is delivered
over the through a fixed
broadcast schedule. For
this purposeIn the 90s, there have been many efforts for
developing video-on-demand over the Internetinternet,
but the telecommunication infrastructure and the software architectures of the
past did not scale very well for large audiences that demand real-time
concurrent access (Lobbecke and Falkenberg 2002). The broadcast model limitations and the incompletelimitations of
the deployed Internetinternet
technology have been disrupted with the adoption
of broadband internet and the development of broadband [dds1]and novel
Peer-to-Peer (P2P) content
distribution distributed softwaresystems
(Androutsellis-Theotokis and Spinellis 2004).
Besides
AppartApart from the
technological limitations of distribution,,
another problem of the current TV
value chain is its hierarchical structured
hierarchically, which . is
not an efficient Such a structure is not efficient
for managing low-demand content that has low
demand. In particular, the hierarchical structure of the TV value
chain makes the trading of the rights and the adaptation of the content to
small markets unprofitable, because it consumes significant resources that are
better spendt to on more
popular TV programmes. The consequence of the hierarchical content distribution
value chain and of the broadcast technology is that the majority of the
available TV content remains unused, because there is not sufficient local
demand, or bandwidth to put it on all
potential broadcast schedules. Besides distribution, the online TV sharing
community is adding value to the video files by providing adaptation of the
content, such as English subtitles for Japanese anime. Thus, the file sharing
networks could be exploited to add value to TV content, through user
participation, without additional localization costs to copyright owners.
Since the economics of broadcast TV are
disrupted by the introduction of the networked DVR, which allows the
asynchronous distribution recording
of content from broadcast and from Internetinternet
sources, it makes sense to re-examine the rationality that has kept the TV
archives and the diversity of the available TV content locked within spatial
and temporal borders.
The Our familiar television
channel is a familiar concept that provides
easy access to audiovisual content across user groups of different cultural and
educational backgrounds. Different TV channels build their brands by providing
competing assortments, or themed TV content. The introduction of the DVR breaks
down the notion of the TV channel and the notion of appointment TV viewing by
allowing the —manual, or automatic—
storage of content from different TV
channels on a Hhard Ddisk Ddrive
(HDD). For
example, TiVo users have access to the stored content through the menu
selection ‘now playing on TiVo’, which becomes the main TV channel for them, by
providing a personalized schedule and assortment of content. In
brief, previous
research suggests that
the disruption regarding
TV channel behavior will be more qualitative (how
the TV channel is going to be packaged),
rather than quantitative (how many TV channels will be available).
Mass communication research has proposed the notion of the
channel repertoire, which and this can
be distinguished into two types: 1) Mthe mindful
channel repertoire (MCR), which is the number of channels that
viewers freely recall watching, and 2) the total channel repertoire (TCR), which is
the number of channels that viewers remember watching if aided recall is used
(Ferguson and Perse 1993). In brief, previous
research
results findings
indicate
that the TV channels is
a very breed familiarity concept
and viewers are loyal to a small set of channels (Lee and Lee 1995), which that fits
in their MCR
(Lee and Lee 1995). It is usually assumed that the introduction of new communications technology
results to in increased
interactivity and choice, but there is evidence that this opportunity had not been
materialized for in the
case of the TV channel repertoire. Ferguson (1992) found that the impact of the
Vvideo- Ccassette Rrecorder
(VCR) and the remote control on the channel repertoire did not substantially
increase the number of channels that viewers watch. Moreover, he found that the
channel repertoire did not change significantly even in cable homes, in which
there are seven times as many channels available as those that can
be viewed on public TV broadcasts.
Recent research by Ferguson and Perse (2004) pointed out that, eventually, the most popular function of the VCR turned out to be not the advertised ability to time-shift TV channels, but the watching of rented movies. By making an analogy to the history of the VCR, the DVR could be employed to enhance access to TV content.
In To summaryize,
previous research has suggested that the channel repertoire is not changing in
terms of quantity (viewers watch the same number of channels regardless of the
number of available
options, such as those offered by multichannel TV), but recent
research suggests that new technology has an impact on TV watching in terms of
quality (viewers consume content from alternative distribution channels, such
as video-rentals, and internetinternet
downloads). Although, time-shiftingtime
shifting is a worthwhile function of the DVR and a possible threat to the
notion of the TV channel, there might be many opportunities for enhancing TV
channels, such as dynamic virtual channels at each user terminal—,
which is the concept we discussed
in Section 3.
Skipping advertising breaks became possible,
for the first time, with the VCR. But, an analog VCR is
not as disturbing to TV advertising as it is its successor, the DVR. TV
broadcasters are reluctant to adopt a STB technology that neglects advertising,
Although because
some Ccontemporary
DVRs offer an 30 second advanced skip
buttonfunctionality (e.g. a
30 second skip button) that makes advertisements
it easy to ignore Ads , but TV channels broadcasters are
reluctant to adopt a STB technology that neglects advertising,
which is —one of their
main revenue sources. Nevertheless,
usage patterns of Ad skipping have not been
researched extensively and there might be additional
opportunities for
advertising by exploiting the storage capacities of DVRs.
Previous research has addressed the issues of skipping
advertising messages with a VCR and found that repeated watching of zipped
commercials had a positive effect on the recall and the recognition constructsof Ads,
when compared to viewing the same advertising message just once (Martin et al.
2002). Indeed, Rrecent
market research has revealed that consumerviewers
replay interesting commercials.[2] .
On the other hand, Ferguson and Perse (2004) surveyed a large
number of TiVo users and they found
that the skipping of advertising is one of the TiVo’s most
popular functions. As a counter measure to address this
emerging behavior, Wirtz and Schwarz (2001) have proposed advertising through product placement
in TV content, which is a
technique that is gaining (e.g. advertising
market share (Economist, 2005sponsoring of TV
programs and product endorsement by the actors). Nevertheless, advertising
product
placement is just a defensive move in the face of a possible threat, but it
as
a strategy, it fails does not to consider
the potential for of novel
advertising formats.
Since Given the
DVR’s
appears to have negative effects to
on
the revenues of obtained through
the established TV advertising model (Barwise 2004), then it
is worthwhile to investigate opportunities for new advertising formats. For
example, TiVo is offering a special area (named ‘TiVo Showcase’), whereby
advertisers may store their advertisements (Ads) and for users to watch them
on-demand. Moreover, Bell and Gemmell (2002) have suggested the
development of dynamic and personalized advertising schemes for supporting the
distribution of digital media.
In summary, there are two opposing arguments about
ITV advertising. Skipping of Ads
is a popular function of the DVR, but there is a potential for positive
advertising effect of advertising
storage and replay. Consumers tend to skip Ads
that have been inserted at the broadcast stream by employing DVRs. On the other
hand, we are going to present ITV prototypes that exploit new systems and
formats for advertising, which consumers find acceptable and likeable.
Therefore, both arguments are true: The former is the threat to the current
business, while the latter is the opportunity for a new business model.
Imagine what it
would be like if TV actually were good.
It would be the end of everything we know.
—Marvin
Minksy
The characteristics of the DVR as an enabler of new business
models for broadcasting are revealed through the study of a few experimental
ITV applications. Then, we can combine the core elements of these
applications are combined into an
integrated framework that exposes the opportunities for new business models
with the networked DVR. Bellow, we are
presenting a set of ITV applications that expose the benefits of the network
DVR for new business models.
The open-source
programming code community has been developing
ed
noumerous novel
Peer-to-Peer (P2P)
protocols and programs, in order to that allow their users to share video
content and large files efficiently,
over (relatively)
low-bandwidth and asymmetrical connections, such as the
InternetADSL lines.
For
examples, many use Tthe
BitTorrent (http://bittorrent.com) and the RSS (Really Simply Syndication)
technologies have been employed to distribute large
files, such
as (e.g. movies
and TV shows) among networked Personal Computers (PCs).
The BitTorrent
protocol[3]
splits a large file into many pieces that can be downloaded in an out-of-order
fashion from many nodes of the network, without imposing any significant bottleneck
effects neither to the backbone infrastructure ,
nor or to the source of the file. Actually, the
BitTorrent protocol becomes fastermore
efficient, as more nodes are added, which resolves the main issue with
the centralized video servers that have been employed for video on-demand in
the past. Furthermore, BitTorrent is designed to enforce altruism among the
users nodes, which means that : every
BitTorrent client downloads approximately as much as it uploads.
The RSS mechanism employesemploys is
a summary file for that users with an
RSS reader can periodically pull from web sites in order to be that
can alerted the user
when a site, or a page has
been updated
automatically when using an
RSS reader. TIn our domain, the
RSS technology is often employed to notify users when a
BitTorrent file becomes available on the network. In brief, one could think of the RSS
as a TV channel schedule and the BitTorrent as a distribution channel.
BitTorrent and RSS have been very popular for in
sharing TV shows that take a long time to be released, or are never released to
other countries—these include (e.g. Japanese anime ,
USA and new US TV
series, etc). For
example, a network traffic analysis[4]
revealed that 30% of all Internet traffic by the
end of 2004 was due to BitTorrent. At the
time of this writing,
one BitTorrent web site[5] had an
index of 5875 files for TV series, while
the most popular Besides distribution, the online TV sharing
community is adding value to the video files by providing adaptation of the
content (e.g. the , such
as English subtitles for Japanese
anime has English subtitles).series (‘The
Lost’, ‘Desperate
Housewives’)
accounted for several hundreds
of thousands of completed downloads (2.149.264,
523.190 respectively)[6].
The combination
of RSS, BitTorrent and a digital video player in an integrated user client, (e.g.such as thea DTV system,[7])
creates a complete alternative to the broadcast TV content distribution and playoutplay
out system. Users have been enabled to can subscribe
to TV channels by selecting an RSS feed, new content is downloaded
automatically and efficiently through the BitTorrent, and it material is
stored and played on a home media station computer. For some types of persistent content (e.g. Ads), such as ads, an
alternative distribution technique is would have to
deliver content through a hidden broadcast channel,[8], which
exploits the unused spectrum portions of the broadcast systems to download
content to a local cache. [dds2]Since Since there
is no requirement for real-time viewing, the distribution bandwidth may be much
larger or much smaller than the bit-rate of the media content. For
example, The combination of BitTorrent with a video player [dds3]have
been deployed by BBC, in the UK,
decided to provide access to last week’s broadcasts
through the interactive Media Player (iMP) application, which is based on
BitTorrent network technology[9] and to the vast BBC archives, as well.
In theory, tFurthermore,
the integration of novel Internetinternet
technology,
in the form of (RSS, and
BitTorrent,
, and video player) with a DVR would enables
allow
the development of a consumer-level networked DVR. Such a device , which could
expose users
to all available
TV the content that is
available for TV, regardless of time and broadcast footprints. TThus, the
content that does not find its way to viewers through the traditional broadcast TV channels
could be downloaded through bandwidth efficient P2P networks, such as
BitTorrent. On the other handIn practice,
content owners and broadcasters have been very sceptical about the traditional
DVR (e.g. . For example, TiVo and ReplayTV have
been legally forced to eliminate the thirty
secondthirty-second Ad ad-skip
button of the their STBs). ThereforeWe can thus
easily see that, the traditional media industry
players might be even more sceptical in the face of the our the proposed emerging
networked DVR.
It
could be argued that Many forms of online sharing of copyrighted
material is are obviously illegal,
. Nevertheless, their sharing
allows but it is also true that people who
would not have any chance to watch obtain these
particular
TV shows are to downloading
download
and watch them.[10].
The discussion regarding the nature of copyright online, which started with the
music industry, is now has
been affecting the movie and the TV industries,
as well. Just like the MP3 and Napster is (slowly) changed changing the
music industry, the networked DVR will may force
TV content producers (particularly niche ones) to devise more
flexible methods for trading their rights in a complex ecosystem of content
producers, consumerviewers
and distributors. One such suggested copyright system is the creative commons
format (Lesigg 2004).
In
any case Irrespective of the regulatory
framework, the availability of the network DVR could be economically beneficial
for broadcasters and content owners. For example, online music and video-rental
stores have been found to make a significant share of their revenue from the
cumulative sales of a very large number of low demand items (Anderson 2004).
This finding has been defined as the ‘Longtail’ of sales, because there is
demand (sales) for so many low-demand items that the ‘tail’ is more important
than the large sales of just a few popular items. The Longtail mentality
could potentially disrupt positively in a positive
way the established broadcast economics, if content provides embrace
alternative distribution channels and exploit copyrighted content that had
is
been remained ing unused
into TV archives. Content owners
(e.g. , such as the BBC,[11])
have realized the potential of the Internetinternet
for the distribution of archival material.
On-demand
distribution of niche and archived content could be also financially rewarding,
if coupled with novel advertising systems and formats, which is
discussed in , which is; the
subject of the next sSection 3.3.
On the delivery
side, the combination of BitTorrent with RSS on a
TV- viewer– friendly
DVR, such as TiVo, might allow the extension of the TV experience to content
that otherwise would not have found its way to the broadcast schedule. Once stored on a DVR and
indexed with related data, the TV content is set free from the constraints
imposed by the medium of broadcast, and can therefore be accessed and manipulated
in countless different ways. Therefore, a new business model for TV should aim
to seamlessly integrate the digital broadcast transmissions, persistent local
storage and Internetinternet
resources, in order to facilitate the augmentation of the TV,
as a medium of entertainment and passive discovery.
On the consumption
reception side, the organization of media
content into a small number of locally assembled and personalized TV channels
simplifies the choice from a vast array of available broadcasts, stored content
and Internetinternet
resources. In this way, the presentation of media programming from virtual
channels[12]
gives the potential for more control to the
user, who can actively shape the flow of the TV content. On the other
handFurthermore, if we accept that the behavior
of the TV audience will not change significantly (Lee and Lee 1995), then the
synthesis of the virtual TV channels is an opportunity for extending the
management of the TV value chain to consumerviewers’
homes. Overall, the networked DVR as a channel aggregator and content
packager model (Figure 2) shifts the decision-making about TV programming from
the broadcast station to the DVR.
Figure 111 The network DVR as a virtual
channel provider
In
Under
this scheme (see figure 1), established or
new content aggregatorsproducers the
storage provide
of the content may be operated
by established or new content aggregators. Existing players or a
new market intermediary may provide the interfaces for managing the channels on
the consumerviewer
side. Moreover, a novel advertising formats that integrate
with the emerging video skipping behaviour (e.g. , such as dynamic
advertisement insertion and personalization), that integrate
with the emerging video skipping behaviour should could be
employed in place of the fixed ad break.
The
main proposition put forward in the present section is that neither the vision
of five hundred channels, nor the vision of a single personalized channel is suitable
for giving consumer access to the digital STB. Instead, it is proposed that a
small number of dynamic virtual channels may offer enough choices to cater for
serendipity in media experiences, while simplifying the access to vast and diversified
sources of television content.
Until nowCurrently,
the duration
and format of the typical advertising break duration and
format was are dictated
respectively
by the economics and the technology of the broadcast medium
respectively. Air-time duration determineds the
pricing, while the passive video format only alloweds the
inclusion of a reference for the collection of further information through a
different media channel (e.g. W, such as the web,
or the phone,
etc). Both barriers have are now fallen
falling,
and TV advertising may can increasingly
employ interactive and alternative duration formats.
Dynamic advertisement (Ad) insertion
has been delivered to consumerviewers by
the XTV platform.[13].
The XTV platform allows the broadcaster to make a deal with the advertisers
regarding Aad skipping on DVR devices. Advertisers have
the option to block skipping of certain Adsads and
the option to purchase Aad ‘air-time’, in order to display a short Aad, when
the user fast-forwards through recorded video content. The system was developed
by NDS as a remedy to the introduction of DVR devices. Since NDS belongs to
Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, the XTV service protects the interests of
the mother parent company: alowingallowing.
Letting the option to the subscribers
of the XTV platform service (e.g. BSkyB plus) to buy a stand-alone DVR would
have allowed consumers them to
skip advertising, which supports a major part of the cost of the TV content. In
order to test consumerviewer
acceptance, Chorianopoulos and Spinellis we (2004)
have developed an interactive music TV application, which inserts
a short Aad, when the user selects to fast-forward to
the next music video-clip (Chorianopoulos
and Spinellis 2004). They We found
that consumerviewers
are positive towards the trade-off of viewing a dynamically inserted adbetween
when skipping content they don’t like
and viewing an Ad, which has been dynamically inserted.
The dynamic advertisement insertion may be employed as a way to
slow the navigation of the user through the finite number of video clips stored
locally. In addition, the video-skipping feature has the benefit of revealing
whether the viewer is actually paying any attention to television programming. From
this respectThus, the video
skippingvideo-skipping feature is an
opportunity for provides the TV advertising researchers to
have with an objective behavioral metric, which is
directly linked to the viewer’s attention to the TV. Furthermore, previous
research has addressed ing the
personalization of TV advertising (Lekakos and Giaglis 2004; Spangler et al. 2003), which allows demonstrates how the advertisers to
achieve a precise can targeting
of their message with increased
precision. In this way, the dynamic advertisement insertion and the
scheduled ad break may be personalized for each user or household. In summary,
the local storage of the DVR can be exploited for more types of advertising and
for more parameters for targeted advertising.
So long as there's a jingle in your head,
television isn’t free.
—
Jason Love
We proposed to regard that the
network DVR should be regarded as a node in the TV
value chain that plays two roles, which were which have been traditionally
assumed by the TV channel operator (e.g. CNN, MTV):
1) Athe ggregates aggregation of content
from hybrid networks (, such as broadcast channels and
the , Internetinternet); and 2) the packages
packaging
oft the content
together with advertising to match the household preferences.
Figure 222 The network DVR should be
considered as an opportunity for new business models in two nodes (programming
and packaging, distribution) in the TV value chain —Adapted from Wirtz and
Schwarz (2001)
Next, we discuss Let us now
examine how the established TV players may fortify their position by
leveraging their sources of competitive advantage and by exploiting the
opportunities of the DVR (figure 2).
In ITV conferences and project meetings with TV executives, there
are two anecdotes that keep coming recur up
every time there is a discussion about ITV content and consumerviewer
behavior. The first anecdote about ITV reflects an apparent pessimism on
behalf of the TV industry executives regarding the viability of
ITV. The saying goes like is: ‘tThere i’s no new
killer application for ITV. The killer application of ITV is TV!’,’,
meaning that interactivity is a nice-to-have —, but not
a must-have— enhancement
to of the
traditional passive TV content. There is also academic research that confirms
the above opinion: that consumerviewers just
simply
want more TV from ITV (Theodoropoulou 2002). Thus, ITV is currently
perceived as a decorative element, which that does not provide any actual
improvement of the existing TV content. Nevertheless, it could be argued that
there exists a killer application for ITV, beyond TV the content
itself, and that is the ability to break-up the dependencey of
on
the content on the broadcast schedule. The networked DVR we presented can
act as both is a content distribution node and as a
virtual channel provider, at the same time.
A second anecdote about ITV concerns the production, development
and adoption of interactive content. It goes like this: ‘Consumers
do no’t buy a
digital Set-Top Box ( digital STB)
because there i’s not enough compelling content and
producers do no’t create
interactive content, because there ae a’re not enough consumerviewers
with a digital STB! It i’s a chicken and egg problem!’ Instead of
producing novel interactive content for ITV, we suggest that TV producers
should develop applications for DVRs that exploit the wealth of digital
broadcasts, local storage and Internetinternet
resources toward for enhancing
their traditional linear TV programs. ConsumerViewers
have already started adopting advanced digital STBs, such as the DVR, DVD-Rs with a HDD and
video-game consoles with a HDD.
In addition, there are already open standards for DTV application
development, such as the Multimedia Home Platform (MHP). The TV
producers need may only need to
develop a single
digital STB application and to insert
the respective appropriate metadata
to their content.
The DVR model has implications for the programming of the
schedules for TV channels. Firstly, the broadcasters may offer an interactive
channel, in addition to their linear one. Then, the dynamic generation of TV
channels from each STB raises the question: ‘Who controls a personalized
channel? Is it the broadcaster or the user?’ Each of these
propositions is discussed below.Here are some
possible answers.
Existing broadcasters that operate a TV channel will find in the
DVR the opportunity to diversify their fixed TV schedule. For example, a music
TV channel such as MTV may offer a virtual MTV channel (iMTV) that provides an
interactive music TV experience (e.g. including
features such as video-clip skipping and related artist information
on demand). The broadcast MTV channel could be
used to promote the iMTV brand and avoid channel switching. During the
broadcast of the popular ‘Ttop 20’
it may display an overlay suggesting to viewers to switch to iMTV (which is a
virtual TV channel) that plays the ‘myTop 20’.
Switching from the broadcast to the virtual channel would be for the MTV
network a preferable outcome instead to one where a of
switching to a different channel, in case the viewer does not like
the currently playing video-clip and switches to a competing channel. After
all, the main objective of the broadcasters is to keep the viewers
tuned into their channels, and since because the
one-size-fits-all fixed schedule of the current TV business model does not
correspond to the fragmented preferences of the contemporary TV audience, then
allowing the viewer to ‘change channel’, but still, remain within
the same ‘mother parent brand’,
seems appears like
a sweet-spot for broadcasters.
The most controversial implication of the DVR regards the entity
that controls the dynamic generation of TV channels at each home. On the one
hand, the DVR implementation may be offered as open-source software for PCs, such as (e.g. MythTV,[14])
and thus, the functionality will be in under the
control of the consumer viewer or
some third-party
personalization software. For example, the consumer viewer will
be able to browse music video content stored on the HDD freely, without any
advertisement insertion. Nevertheless, indexing of the content will be
restricted to the extent that the TV content can be automatically segmented and
indexed with free resources from the Internetinternet.
On the other hand, a broadcaster may offer the DVR as part of a subscription
service (e.g. , such as the
UK’s BSkyB Sky+ service in the UK).
In this case, the broadcaster may assume the complete control of what is stored
on the HDD and how it is played from the DVR. Nevertheless, it would be
beneficial for the broadcaster to allow increased control to the consumerviewer,
although the transfer of control might be reflected to as a
higher price on the subscription fee. For example, consumers viewers may
be allowed to skip advertising breaks, but they will have to pay a higher fee
for this privilege. Besides Between the
two extreme possibilities of control, there is a wide spectrum of control
schemes that balance between the needs of the consumer viewer and
the broadcaster.
The introduction of the DVR has released freed the
TV channel from the linearity of the fixed broadcast schedule. The same
properties that apply to TV content, apply to advertising too. Thus, an
advertising video clip need not be part of an advertising break and need not be
presented at the same time for to all consumersviewers.
For most countries, there is a regulatory framework for TV advertising that
dictates how often and how many advertisements may be shown during a broadcast
schedule. The extension of the TV experience beyond the fixed broadcast
schedule is likely to create new regulations for the delivery of advertising
messages. For example, if a virtual TV channel is left to play without viewer
intervention, it should conform to the existing legislation that applies to TV
advertising. ButFurthermore,
if the consumerviewer chooses
is
allowed to manipulate the flow of the virtual TV channel, then, it
should be either revenues will have to be supported by a
subscription fee or by a novel advertising scheme, such as the dynamic
advertisement insertion, which is described next.
After the advertising video-clip is released from the ties of the
ad break and the broadcast schedule, creative advertisers will have the
opportunity to experiment with new formats. The traditional advertising
video-clip may be augmented with additional on-demand information and may
expand its duration beyond the typical thirty seconds. For example, video-clip
skipping by the consumerviewer may
insert a short advertising teaser that links to a short-movie advertisement and/or
to an interactive product
demonstration. The characteristic that makes the dynamic advertisement
insertion such a powerful format is the certainty that the viewer will watch
it, since it has been implicitly triggered by the viewerthe
viewer has implicitly triggered it, in order to get to the next video
clip. As a consequence, for each advertisement there may be accurate statistics
regarding the number of STBs in which it has been displayed (reach) and the frequency
with which
potential consumers viewed itthat has been
viewed by consumers. Viewers
may even be allowed to tag adverts and
propagate their opinions to their friends through RSS feeds.
In the recent past, the DTV systems created the opportunity for a
new player in the media industry. TV channel aggregators, (such as
XXX[dds4]e.g.
BSkyB), provide to TV
viewers with
a coherent collection of TV content and services that gratifies
are targeted
to various specific
a wide gamut of groups of preferences,
such as music, sports, movies, and news.
In the same way, the DVR creates opportunities for a new business role. The DVR
content aggregator is a new mediating role in the TV industry that combines
the available broadcast transmission with additional audiovisual
elements from
other sources, such as the (Internetinternet, and
computer generated graphics), to for the provision
de
of personalized TV channels. For
example, there are multiple music TV channels available on a digital satellite
system and each of them may be themed. If the music video-clips are broadcasted
without any fixed overlay (e.g. channel
logo), then there is no barrier to create a music TV channel for each
household. By reversing the promotion scheme used internally for
by
a music TV channel to promote its interactive spin-off, the virtual TV
channels may promote their ancestors by displaying overlays suggesting to
viewers that ‘more music like this may be enjoyed on that channel.’
The synthesis of a TV channel from content available on
potentially competitive TV channels may seem contradictory, but the role of the
TV channel aggregator has always been to re-package the available content and
to market it to new audiences, which that are not reached by the existing
market offerings. The balance of power between the established broadcasters and
the new channel aggregators is reflected in the struggle between the
information technology (IT) and the traditional TV players. TV players have the
experience of the TV formats, ownership of rights to content and the knowledge
of the TV audience, but IT players are developing and deploying the tools that
will shape the new TV experience. Unless the TV players employ the networked
DVR to leverage their unique competitive advantages, the consumerviewers
will pull the DVR from the new emerging market entrants, such as TiVo and
ReplayTV.
The marvels of film, radio, and television are
marvels of one-way communication, which is not communication at all.
—Milton
Mayer
If TV content
was mediated delivered through
a the digital STB’s computer program,
then it would make possible any kind software provides new opportunities of
of control,,
which has both with
associated advantages and disadvantagesproblems.
On the one hand, being able to control the TV experience at consumerviewers’
households has considerable ethical implications. Computer programs in digital
STBs may store and analyze a wide variety of interactions for every household.
Then, the interactions may be connected to personality characteristics, which
is a major privacy issue. For example, the interactive music TV usage may
reveal a great deal of about musical
tastes, which could be associated with personality traits and psychological
state. On the other hand, the availability of detailed user models makes
possible a allows content to be individually personalized
approach for each individual, thus improving a medium ,
which that has been criticized as mass and passive.
Therefore, the balance between privacy and personalization features will be a
major research and practice issue as ITV becomes more widespread.
The dynamic Aad
insertion and the personalized TV channels entail two seemingly antithetical
suggestions for the future of the TV industry. On the one hand, TV content
should be annotated, linked with external resources and indexed at the
video-clip level, which suggests more freedom for consumerviewers to
manipulate the flow of the TV channel. On the other hand, the need to protect
copyright might force the broadcasters to devise new forms of intrusive
advertising, such as the dynamic advertisement insertion, which are strongly
coupled with the TV content at the software level, meaning that consumerviewers
have less freedom over what to watch. It is argued that the DVR operators
should balance the two extremes, in order to devise service offerings that are
viewers
will be willing to pay fordesirable by consumers.
For example, a subscription scheme may offer total freedom for recording and
skipping of
TV content in exchange of a high fee. At the other end, free TV may be
offered with support from intrusive advertising similar to the contemporary
free Wweb sites. In between the two extremes, lies
a multitude of possibilities for the broadcasters and consumerviewers to
select. Overall, the main threat that the TV industry is now facing is
in comes from not recognizing the opportunities
offered by the networked DVR.
The present research opens up more new research questions than
the old ones that it has addressed, both for
business models and for related disciplines. In the context of related
disciplines, further research should consider the obstacles that the networked
DVR is facing, such as technical standards, consumer adoption, regulatory
framework, and content copyrightdigital rights
management (Rosenblat et al. 2001). For example, the
lack of commonly agreed technical standards, or the existence a single popular
platform is a barrier in prevents the
wide quick
adoption of advanced STBs by consumers,
because application developers have to develop and support multiple code-bases.
The regulatory framework is also an obstacle, because there are
certain outdated laws and rules, such as those
controlling the number and the size of the time slots for ads, that
govern the broadcast and advertising industries, such as the
number and the size of the time slots for Ads.
Since the networked DVR disrupts the established process of TV advertising,
there is a need to re-examine the respective regulatory framework, as well. In
the context of business models, further research should consider the multiple
aspects of the commercialization of a new technology by existing, or new market
entrants. In particular, there is a need for detailed quantitative business
model analysis regarding established broadcast players. The latter have become
more vulnerable to new market entrants, because new information and
communication technologies, such as the networked DVR, have distributed shifted the
control of
the TV content’s distribution and presentation control from
the single broadcast point to multiple user nodes.
Parts of this work were supported by several research projects (partly funded by the European Commission) over the period 2000-2004. We are especially grateful to the partners of the following projects: IMEDIA (IST-1999-11038), CONTESSA (IST-2000-28567), and MUSICAL (EDC-22131).
Anderson, C. The long tail. Wired, 12(10), 2004.
Androutsellis-Theotokis, S. and Spinellis, D. A survey of
peer-to-peer content distribution technologies. ACM Computing Surveys,
36(4):335–371, December 2004.
Atkin, D. J., Neuendorf, K., Jeffres, L. W., and Skalski, P. Predictors of audience interest in adopting digital television. Journal of Media Economics, 16(3):159–173, 2003.
Bell, G. and Gemmell, J. A call for the home media network. Communications of the ACM, 45(7):71–75, 2002.
Barwise, P. Long-term issues for TV advertising, In Howe, M. (Editor). The New Medium of Television, Interactive Digital Sales Report, 2004
Bozios,
T., Lekakos, G., Skoularidou, V., and Chorianopoulos, K. Advanced techniques
for personalized advertising in a digital tvTV
environment: The imedia system. In Proceedings of the eBusiness and eWork Conference, 2001.
Carey, J. Interactive television trials and marketplace experiences. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 5(2):207–216, 1997.
Choi, H.,
Choi, M., Kim, J., and Yu, H. An empirical study on the adoption of information
appliances with a focus on interactive tvTV. Telematics
and Informatics, 20(2):161–183, 2003.
Chorianopoulos, K. and Spinellis, D. Affective usability evaluation for an interactive music television channel. Computers in Entertainment, 2(3):14, 2004.
Dawson, C. Television advertising: In
need of reinvention? International Journal of Marketing, 15(4), 1996.
Economist. Product placement: Lights, camera, brands. The Economist, print edition, October 27th, 2005.
Ferguson,
D. A. Channel repertoire in the presence of remote control devices, VCRvcrs and cable television. Journal of Broadcasting and
Electronic Media, 36(1):83–91,
1992.
Ferguson, D. A. and Perse, E. M. Media and audience influences on channel repertoire. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(1):31–47, 1993.
Ferguson, D. A. and Perse,
E. M. Audience satisfaction among tTivVo and rReplaytvTV users. Journal
of Interactive Advertising, 4(2), 2004.
Hart,
J. Content Models: Will IPTV be more of the same, or different? In Noam, E.M., Groebel, J., Gerbarg, D.
(Editors), Internet Television, p205-214.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004
InsightExpress.
and MediaPost. Demystifying digital video recorders, 2004.[dds5]
Kaitatzi-Whitlock, S.
Implementing strategies for digital pay television in eEurope:
The case of gGreece.
Telematics and Informatics, 16(3):151–176, 1999.
Lee, B. and Lee, R. S. How and why
people watch tvTV: Implications for the future of
interactive television. Journal of
Advertising Research, 35(6):9–18, 1995.
Lekakos, G. and Giaglis, G. M. A lifestyle-based approach for delivering personalized advertisements in digital interactive television. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(2), 2004.
Lessig, L. In Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. The Penguin Press, 2004.
Lobbecke, C. and Falkenberg, M. A
framework for assessing market entry opportunities for internetinternet-based
tvTV. The International Journal on Media
Management, 4(2):95–104, 2002.
Martin,
B. A., Nguyen, V. T.-U. L., and Wi, J.-Y. Remote control marketing:
how Aad fast-forwarding and Aad repetition affect consumers. Marketing Intelligence and
Planning, 20(1):44–48, 2002.
Pramataris, K., Papakyriakopoulos, D., Lekakos, G., and
Mylonopoulos, N. Personalised interactive tv TV advertising:
The imMedia business model. Electronic Markets,
11(1), 2001.
Rose, F. The revolution will be televised. Wired, 11(10), 2003.
Spangler, W. E., Gal-Or, M.,
and May, J. H. Using data mining to profile tvTV
viewers. Commun. ACM, 46(12):66–72, 2003.
Rosenblatt, W., Trippe, W. and Mooney, S. Digital Rights Management: Business and Technology.Hungry Minds, Inc.Indianapolis, IN, 2001.
Theodoropoulou, V. The rise or the fall of interactivity? digital television and the “first generation” of the digital audience in the uk. In Proceedings of the RIPE@2002 Conference - Broadcasting and Convergence: Articulating a New Remit, 2002.
Whittingham, J. Digital local storage. Durlacher, December 2000.
Wirtz, B. W.
and Schwarz, J. Strategic implications of the segments of one tvTV - the
evolution of the personalised television
structure. The International Journal on Media Management,
3(1):15–25, 2001.
[1] We use the acronym DVR (digital video recorder) to refer to devices such as TiVo, which uses an internal Hard Disk Drive (HDD) to record audiovisual content and to store executable, just like a personal computer. There are many other names that are used in the literature to refer to the same category of devices. To name a few: PVR (personal video recorder), DPTR (digital personal television receiver), HMS (home media server).
[2] Viewers Use
Web, TiVo to Extend Reach, Frequency of TV Adsads http://www.mediapost.com/dtls_dsp_news.cfm?newsID=236935
Accessed on 30/10/2004
[3] BitTorrent Economics: http://bittorrent.com/bittorrentecon.pdf Accessed on 31/10/2004
[4] http://www.cachelogic.com/research/2005_slide06.php Accessed on 29/11/2005
[5] http://www.mybittorrent.com/bittorrent/television/ Accessed on 29/11/2005
[6] http://thepiratebay.org/brwsearch.php?b=1&c=205, Accessed on 29/11/2005
[7] The DTV system is an open source project for Linux, Mac, Windows, developed by the Participatory Culture Foundation: http://participatoryculture.org
[8] A hidden satellite channel has been used to download and store on a DVR advertisements, in order to provide targeted ad breaks in place of the schedules ad breaks (Bozios et al. 2001)
[9] BBC moves ahead with TV downloads http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/4552635.stm Accessed on 25/9/2005
[10] Must-download TV http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/08/11/must_download_tv/ Accessed on 2/11/2004
[11] BBC launches online clips archive: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/3525455.stm Accessed on 3/11/2004
[12] The term virtual channel was first suggested by Whittingham (2000)
[13] Murdoch's Must-See TV: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.09/mustread.html?pg=7 Accessed on 2/11/2004
[14] MythTV is a popular open-source DVR project based on the Linux OS